Immigration: the more the scarier?
Saturday 1 November, 5.15pm until 6.15pm, Upper Gulbenkian Gallery

Since last year’s Battle of Ideas debate, anxiety over immigration has continued to increase. Polls indicate that significant majorities believe there is an immigration ‘crisis’, and there is much handwringing over whether Enoch Powell’s predictions in his ‘rivers of blood’ speech 40 years ago will finally materialise. Against this backdrop, the UK government has introduced a points-based system awarding preference on the basis of migrants’ skill-level. But the arguments for and against immigration are political and moral as well as economic.

Those who want to restrict immigration think our borders are recklessly wide-open. They call instead for ‘managed migration’, arguing that we have a responsibility to our fellow citizens who face job losses thanks to competition from immigrants, with a recent Lords report insisting immigration has had ‘little or no’ positive economic impact. Moreoever, it is argued, open borders undermine concepts of sovereignty and citizenship, and weaken social cohesion. And while few express openly racist sentiments today, many worry about a xenophobic reaction from the white working class.

Advocates of a more liberal approach see the current immigration laws as inhumanely restrictive. They point to the economic benefits of immigration, and argue that in any case the character of migration is changing: we should see migrants as increasingly hyper-mobile commuters who enrich our society and culture, rather than settlers intent on transforming Britain. Furthermore, campaigners argue we have an ethical duty to asylum seekers, and even that free migration for all is a positive moral good in its own right.

Is the much touted tidal wave of immigrants a reality or an exaggeration? Would an open door be a boon or a bane? What kind of immigration policy should we adopt?

 Speakers
Ceri Dingle
director, WORLDwrite & WORLDbytes
Frank Field, MP
Labour MP for Birkenhead; co-chair, Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration; author, Neighbours from Hell: The Politics of Behaviour
Nathalie Rothschild
freelance journalist; producer and reporter for Sweden's public service radio
Professor Bob Rowthorn
emeritus professor of Economics, University of Cambridge; Fellow, King's College; author Democracy and Efficiency in the Economic Enterprise
Chair:
Alex Hochuli
communications consultant, researcher and blogger based in São Paulo


 Produced by
Alex Hochuli communications consultant, researcher and blogger based in São Paulo

 Recommended readings
Like house prices, immigration could fall too

The thing about population projections is that they are usually wrong. Our problem in future may be getting people to stay

David Aaronovitch, The Times, 9 September 2008

Balanced Migration - A new approach to controlling immigration

A new report argues that the number of immigrants who are given permission to settle permanently in this country should be kept to approximately the same level as the number of British citizens who are emigrating

MigrationwatchUK, 8 September 2008

The crowded house fallacy

Far from being a problem, more people can be a boon. Other people are what make our lives special; and the more people there are, the greater the chances of coming up with the new ideas that transform our lives for the better

Philippe Legrain, Guardian Unlimited, 5 April 2008

Open up – Special report: Migration

More human mobility has both created wealth and helped to share it out more equally

Adam Roberts, The Economist, 3 January 2008

The emergence of 'super-diversity' in Britain

Britain is now characterised by the unprecedented complexity and variety of different groups within its borders

Steven Vertovec, COMPAS, 2006

The Politics of Immigration and Membership

Transnational migration produces blatant contradictions between universal human rights and the extant set of naturalization, immigration, refugee, and asylum policies

Nadia Urbinati, Dissent Magazine, September 2005


Open borders: A future for Europe, migrants and the world economy

Protectionism here is, as elsewhere, directed to fruitless attempts to capture benefits for a minority at the cost of the world at large

Nigel Harris, openDemocracy, 12 June 2003

Session partners