Sunday 20 October, 10.30am until 12.00pm, Frobisher Auditorium 2 Battle over Scientific Information
Big Data is the big idea of the moment. According to IBM, we’re creating 2.5 quintillion bytes of data every day, with over 90% of the world’s data having been produced in the past two years alone. The data itself is everything from the songs you’ve been listening to and your holiday snaps to your medical records and the websites you’ve visited. Its applications are numerous and varied – from delivering personalised adverts to your computer to the perhaps more noble goal of predicting and dealing with epidemics.
Many hope these huge data sets will change our lives for the better. Combining vast data collection with computing power enables new research techniques to find links between environment, behaviour and illness, resulting in better health for us all. Linking health records to supermarket loyalty cards, for example, could allow the state to better target healthcare to individual needs, and provide a new intervention tool to change unhealthy behaviour. However this means giving up an element of the confidentiality we traditionally entrusted to our doctors - the new General Practice Extraction Service will remove identifiable patient data directly from GP records without consulting them, so it can be passed around and made available to researchers. It’s impossible to predict how, or by whom, information on us might be used in future. There are concerns too about the corporations who are collecting reams of information about us. ISPs, Google, Apple and network providers all collect information about their customers, and use it to their benefit. Governments too are interested in the data collected by these companies. With smart phones being ubiquitous, and the rise of technologies like Google Glass, our every moment can be recorded in some fashion and there are concerns that this all-encompassing surveillance has dire implications for our privacy.
Are we right to be worried about the privacy implications, or do we need to let go of some of our data for the greater good? Should we be asked for our consent every time our information is stored, as we are when we donate blood? Ought we to draw a line between data collection for use by scientists and policy purposes and the data collected by companies? Can big data change the world and if so, who do we trust with ours?
Dr Tim Hubbard
senior group leader, Vertebrate Genome Analysis Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute |
|
Bryan Joseph
partner, PwC |
|
Christine Rosen
fellow, New America Foundation; senior editor, New Atlantis |
|
Sandy Starr
communications officer, Progress Educational Trust; webmaster, BioNews |
|
Dr Martyn Thomas
vice-president for external affairs, Royal Academy of Engineering |
|
Chair: | |
Timandra Harkness
journalist, writer & broadcaster; presenter, Futureproofing and other BBC Radio 4 programmes; author, Big Data: does size matter? |
You may not be that bothered about the idea of living in a smart city but I bet you'd love to live in one that was happy.
Jane Wakefield, BBC, 27 August 2013Measuring public sentiment is a key task for researchers and policymakers alike. The explosion of available social media data allows for a more time-sensitive and geographically specific analysis than ever before.
K.Z. Bertrand, M. Bialik, K. Virdee, Andreas Gros, Y. Bar-Yam,, NECSI, 20 August 2013The City of London is halting a scheme that used recycling bins to track people as they walked by with their smartphones. The head of Renew London, which was behind the operation, wrote in an email, “I can confirm that we are not currently running any trials.”
Zachary M. Seward and Siraj Datoo, QUARTZ, 12 August 2013GE has a short video series on a fictional town called Datalandia where machines talk to each other and data is exchanged in a hero-like fashion.
GE, 26 July 2013The world of social-engineering surveillance is growing rapidly.
Christine Rosen, Slate, 20 June 2013