Sunday 20 October, 5.15pm until 6.15pm, Frobisher 1-3 Contemporary Controversies
David Cameron has announced £50m will be allocated for an ‘historic’ commemoration of the centenary of the First World War. But while we can all agree that the war itself was an epochal event, what will be the meaning of a commemoration? Can you commemorate a world war without celebrating the savage butchery of millions? Critics such as Plaid Cymru’s Jonathan Edwards suggest it would be more appropriate to remember the end of a conflict, rather than its beginning. So is there anything to be said for a commemoration next year?
A recent survey indicates that only six out of ten people feel that they have sufficient knowledge of the First World War, with that number falling with reducing age. Perhaps therefore, the centenary is an important educational opportunity. But are we sure what lessons should be learnt? Cameron argues that however frustrating and difficult are today’s debates in Europe, at least ‘we sort out our differences through dialogue at meetings around conference tables, not through the battle on the fields of Flanders’. But is the implication that ‘to jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war’ any more than a cliché? Some insist that the ‘Great War’ was one of the greatest mistakes of the 20th century – in which lions were led by donkeys. Is this the full story or a myth as simplistic as any jingoistic account?
We are told one core aim of the centenary is to honour those who served and remember those who died. But who should be remembered and honoured? There is already controversy about whether the names of every German soldier who died should appear alongside the British dead soldiers at the Cenotaph, or how much emphasis should be placed on the achievement of the allies; France’s losses were double Britain’s, and by the end of the war, the largest army on the Western Front was American. Can and should the centenary avoid squabbles about victors and losers? Or might such debates help us learn more about the reality of the First World War rather than a one dimensional version of history?
editor, History Today
politics teacher and head of social science, Queen's School, Bushey; co-author, Who's Afraid Of The Easter Rising?
Sir Hew Strachan
Chichele Professor of the History of War, University of Oxford; member, UK National Committee for the Centenary of the First World War
creative director, Pagefield
A profoundly personal and thought-provoking new analysis of the Great War from one of our leading broadcasters Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2428591/JEREMY-PAXMAN-Dont-insult-Uncle-Charlie-comrades.html#ixzz2gSiZiTjq Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on FacebookJeremy Paxman, Daily Mail, 21 September 2013
There is no longer any danger that marking the centenary will lead to blinkered patriotism; the popular narrative of mud, useless slaughter and poetry triumphed long agoIan Jack, Guardian, 13 September 2013
We have two contrary views of the First World War – one of triumph and pride, the other of tragedy and sorrow. But as we prepare for the centenary next year, we must be aware that the truth is never that simple, says Harry MountHarry Mount, Telegraph, 9 June 2013
The lessons of the first world war are not a settled question in modern Britain, nor is how to commemorate itMartin Kettle, Guardian, 30 May 2013
Oh dear. I think we can already see how this one is going to play out: mud, futility of war, lions led by donkeys, a bit of poetry, a nod to the nurses and the munitions girls and a solemn conclusion that it must ‘never be allowed to happen again’.Robert Hardman, Daily Mail, 14 January 2013
Breaking ranks with the Government’s centenary advisory board, Hew Strachan argues that our commemoration of World War One is in danger of becoming sterile and boringHew Strachan, Telegraph, 11 January 2013
Prime Minister David Cameron today set out the Government’s plans to mark the centenary of the start of the First World War in 2014.Prime Minister's Office, 11 October 2012
The poppy is a political symbol. So why are players and fans being told to conform with the idea of wearing one?Kevin Rooney, spiked, 11 November 2010
Death in Venice: is tourism killing or saving the city?
"What I love about The Battle of Ideas is that it really is a battle. I've still got the scalps (and wounds) to prove it. The audience were battlers too. A brilliant, memorable weekend."
Andrew Keen, entrepreneur; founder, Audiocafe.com; author, Digital Vertigo