First World War: the hundred years view

Sunday 20 October, 5.15pm until 6.15pm, Frobisher 1-3 Contemporary Controversies

David Cameron has announced £50m will be allocated for an ‘historic’ commemoration of the centenary of the First World War. But while we can all agree that the war itself was an epochal event, what will be the meaning of a commemoration? Can you commemorate a world war without celebrating the savage butchery of millions? Critics such as Plaid Cymru’s Jonathan Edwards suggest it would be more appropriate to remember the end of a conflict, rather than its beginning. So is there anything to be said for a commemoration next year?

A recent survey indicates that only six out of ten people feel that they have sufficient knowledge of the First World War, with that number falling with reducing age. Perhaps therefore, the centenary is an important educational opportunity. But are we sure what lessons should be learnt? Cameron argues that however frustrating and difficult are today’s debates in Europe, at least ‘we sort out our differences through dialogue at meetings around conference tables, not through the battle on the fields of Flanders’. But is the implication that ‘to jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war’ any more than a cliché? Some insist that the ‘Great War’ was one of the greatest mistakes of the 20th century – in which lions were led by donkeys. Is this the full story or a myth as simplistic as any jingoistic account?

We are told one core aim of the centenary is to honour those who served and remember those who died. But who should be remembered and honoured? There is already controversy about whether the names of every German soldier who died should appear alongside the British dead soldiers at the Cenotaph, or how much emphasis should be placed on the achievement of the allies; France’s losses were double Britain’s, and by the end of the war, the largest army on the Western Front was American. Can and should the centenary avoid squabbles about victors and losers? Or might such debates help us learn more about the reality of the First World War rather than a one dimensional version of history?

Speakers
Paul Lay
editor, History Today

Kevin Rooney
politics teacher and head of social science, Queen's School, Bushey; co-author, Who's Afraid Of The Easter Rising?

Sir Hew Strachan
Chichele Professor of the History of War, University of Oxford; member, UK National Committee for the Centenary of the First World War

Chair:
Lesley Katon
creative director, Pagefield

Produced by
Lesley Katon creative director, Pagefield
Recommended readings
Don't insult my Uncle Charlie or his comrades. Their sacrifice in WWI foiled Germany's plan to rule the world, by JEREMY PAXMAN

A profoundly personal and thought-provoking new analysis of the Great War from one of our leading broadcasters Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2428591/JEREMY-PAXMAN-Dont-insult-Uncle-Charlie-comrades.html#ixzz2gSiZiTjq Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Jeremy Paxman, Daily Mail, 21 September 2013

A century on from the first world war, the old narratives feel long gone

There is no longer any danger that marking the centenary will lead to blinkered patriotism; the popular narrative of mud, useless slaughter and poetry triumphed long ago

Ian Jack, Guardian, 13 September 2013

How should we remember the First World War?

We have two contrary views of the First World War – one of triumph and pride, the other of tragedy and sorrow. But as we prepare for the centenary next year, we must be aware that the truth is never that simple, says Harry Mount

Harry Mount, Telegraph, 9 June 2013

It is absurd to pretend our armed forces fight only in just wars

The lessons of the first world war are not a settled question in modern Britain, nor is how to commemorate it

Martin Kettle, Guardian, 30 May 2013

Why we SHOULD upset the Germans - by reminding them of their Great War atrocities Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar

Oh dear. I think we can already see how this one is going to play out: mud, futility of war, lions led by donkeys, a bit of poetry, a nod to the nurses and the munitions girls and a solemn conclusion that it must ‘never be allowed to happen again’.

Robert Hardman, Daily Mail, 14 January 2013

First World War anniversary: we must do more than remember

Breaking ranks with the Government’s centenary advisory board, Hew Strachan argues that our commemoration of World War One is in danger of becoming sterile and boring

Hew Strachan, Telegraph, 11 January 2013

Plans to mark World War I centenary announced

Prime Minister David Cameron today set out the Government’s plans to mark the centenary of the start of the First World War in 2014.

Prime Minister's Office, 11 October 2012

Why Celtic fans won’t join in the poppy parade

The poppy is a political symbol. So why are players and fans being told to conform with the idea of wearing one?

Kevin Rooney, spiked, 11 November 2010

Europe's new far right, fear or fantasy?

"The Battle of Ideas is an entertaining and provocative think-jam. At the 2012 event, we didn’t quite solve the world’s problems, but we certainly got part of the way there"
Christine Murray, editor, Architects' Journal

follow the Academy of Ideas