Infrastructure and investment: have we lost our nerve?

Saturday 19 October, 1.30pm until 3.00pm, Frobisher Auditorium 1 Battle for technological progress

With HM Treasury having recently set up a new body to oversee £350bn of infrastructure investment, are we about to see an explosion of large projects around the UK? Or can we expect large-scale infrastructure projects to be used as political footballs and kicked into touch by a government too wary to risk its reputation on implementing them? The proposed HS2 high-speed rail network has been written off by some even before the first rail sleeper is to be laid in 2017, and not only on anti-development grounds; some suggest the future is with driverless cars rather than rail. Meanwhile, Thames Water’s proposed £4.2bn super sewer, meant to replace the capital’s creaking Victorian sewerage system, faces strong local opposition because of fears about smells, expected congestion and economic effects.

Of course, not everything ends up being tied up in bureaucratic wrangling, opposition and procedural delays. The massive re-development of the 2012 Olympic park area including its stadia and underground infrastructure was a success—perhaps spurred on by an immovable deadline. There continues to be a lot of energy put into high-speed broadband networks, including providing digital infrastructure for the largest cities in the UK, in the hope that it will help businesses grow faster and make them more efficient. London’s Crossrail, currently Europe’s largest infrastructure project, provides another example of how to deliver an ambitious construction project that will have a significant impact on the capital’s rail network when completed in 2018. But while the spotlight is on improving the nation’s rail network, perhaps the more pressing problem is how to update our roads – with or without driverless cars – not least because the majority of the economy relies heavily on road transportation. Past governments have all resisted large-scale investment in road-building programmes, not least because of environmentalist concerns about cars.

Why do some projects succeed while others struggle to get started? Is the problem the lack of a political sponsor, able to conjure up the compelling vision necessary to inspire support and private investment? Are environmental issues and concerns taken too seriously, or is the problem a NIMBY attitude that ignores the bigger picture? Should more effort be spent in deregulation and easing up the planning process to encourage competition between construction providers? Or is there an unwillingness to tear down existing infrastructure because no-one wants to lose face over betting on untested new ideas?

Speakers
Richard Hoare
director, Capital Projects and Infrastructure Team, PwC

Daniel Moylan
former deputy chairman of Transport for London; Conservative Councillor; co-chairman, Urban Design London

Michael Owens
commercial director, Bow Arts Trust; owner, London Urban Visits; formerly, head of development policy, London Development Agency

Vicky Pryce
board member, Centre for Economics and Business Research; economic advisor, British Chamber of Commerce

Paul Westbury
CEO, Buro Happold

Chair:
Martyn Perks
digital business consultant and writer; co-author, Big Potatoes: the London manifesto for innovation

Produced by
Martyn Perks digital business consultant and writer; co-author, Big Potatoes: the London manifesto for innovation
Recommended readings
UK infrastructure projects need better cost-saving principles

“Substantial progress” has been made in establishing cost-saving principles in some large UK infrastructure projects, including High Speed 2 (HS2), but others in energy, waste and telecoms are lagging behind, according to a government report.

Marino Donati, Supply Management, 19 June 2013

HS2 rail plans: Think tank raises doubts over value

Demand for the HS2 high-speed rail project has

BBc, 18 June 2013

Morning papers: Infrastructure projects to get £15bn boost

The coalition will announce £15bn of extra spending for future major infrastructure projects next month, in a move designed to stimulate the economy and challenge Labour to outline its own plans to revive growth, reports the Financial Times.

Matthew Jeynes, Financial Times, 31 May 2013

UK plans for superfast broadband 'neither super nor fast'

The UK needs to invest much more heavily in fibre optic broadband infrastructure or the country risks being

Olivia Solon, Wired, 22 March 2012

Session partners