Doping is generally defined as anything that artificially enhances human physical performance in an unethical way. Arguably, however, the list of banned drugs is not coherent, and there is no clearly defined distinction between legal and illegal procedures. Even the efficacy of the World Anti-Doping Agency is subject to skepticism, and there is suspicion even when athletes present negative doping tests. It is widely assumed that only naive and poorly equipped sportsmen will be caught, and that modern doping techniques are unverifiable. The consequence is that all world record-breaking performances are now viewed with suspicion.

If negative doping tests are not considered reliable, why go on testing? Does the concept of doping make any sense at all? Why should being ‘natural’ be a key criterion in the entirely artificial context of competitive sports anyway? Does something like ‘natural human performance’ really exist? Is the objective of ‘clean sport’ worth pursuing if the means used to achieve it are legally dubious and encroach personal freedom? What consequences might we expect from ending the criminalisation of doping?

The event will be attended by Angus Kennedy, a guest representative from the Battle of Ideas Organising Committee.

NB. This event is invitation only. Please email battle@novo-magazin.de.

Venue: MMK Museum für Moderne Kunst, Frankfurt, Germany